In brief
From Disruptions to Adaptation: A Systematic Literature Review of Digital Resilience Factors for Healthcare Workers' Continued Use of Health Information Systems is a nursing research record that should be interpreted using the available source metadata.
What this article is about
Quick Answer
From Disruptions to Adaptation: A Systematic Literature Review of Digital Resilience Factors for Healthcare Workers' Continued Use of Health Information Systems is a nursing research record that should be interpreted using the available source metadata.
Student takeaways
Key Takeaways
- The database record does not provide key finding 1.
- The database record does not provide key finding 2.
- The database record does not provide key finding 3.
- The database record does not provide key finding 4.
- The database record does not provide key finding 5.
Student summary
Why This Research Matters
This article, titled 'From Disruptions to Adaptation: A Systematic Literature Review of Digital Resilience Factors for Healthcare Workers' Continued Use of Health Information Systems,' explores a critical issue in modern healthcare. As you know from your nursing informatics classes, Health Information Systems (HIS) are vital tools that help improve patient care and streamline workflows. However, these systems often face problems like unreliable internet connections or technical glitches, which can disrupt their use by busy healthcare workers such as nurses.
The authors of this study recognized a gap in the existing research. While many studies have looked at why healthcare workers first adopt HIS (the initial 'buy-in'), there's been less focus on what helps them keep using these systems even when problems occur. This is where the concept of 'digital resilience' comes into play – it refers to the ability of individuals and organizations to adapt, recover, and continue functioning effectively in the face of challenges or disruptions.
The study itself was a systematic literature review. This means that the authors carefully searched for all relevant existing research on this topic across various fields like health, nursing, and information systems. They then analyzed these studies to find common themes and patterns. The abstract mentions they looked at 34 such studies. From their analysis of over 80 initial ideas (codes), they were able to identify 10 key factors that contribute to digital resilience for healthcare workers using HIS.
These 10 factors are organized into three main levels: 1. **Personal Capacity:** This refers to the skills, knowledge, and attitudes of individual healthcare workers themselves. For example, a nurse who is confident in their ability to troubleshoot basic technical issues or who has good problem-solving skills might be more resilient when faced with an HIS disruption. 2. **Organizational Support:** This involves the support provided by the hospital, clinic, or other health organization where the healthcare worker is employed. Examples include having reliable IT help desks, clear policies for reporting and addressing system problems, training programs to build digital skills, and a culture that encourages learning from mistakes rather than blaming individuals. 3. **Technological Factors:** This level focuses on the HIS itself and its environment. Resilience here might involve systems designed with redundancy (so if one part fails, another can take over), user-friendly interfaces that are less prone to errors, or robust backup systems for data.
The authors explain how each of these 10 factors primarily supports a specific aspect of resilience capacity. For instance, some factors might help healthcare workers quickly adapt their workarounds when the system is down (adaptability), while others might ensure they can recover lost information if a system crash occurs (recovery).
As nursing students learning about informatics and technology in healthcare, it's important to understand these findings because HIS are increasingly integrated into daily practice. This research helps us see that simply implementing an HIS isn't enough for its long-term success. The continued use of these systems depends on a combination of individual skills, supportive organizational structures, and well-designed technology.
When appraising this study as students, consider the following: * **Research Focus:** It addresses a practical problem – ensuring that valuable health IT investments are used effectively over time despite inevitable disruptions. This is highly relevant to nursing practice where HIS can directly impact patient care efficiency and safety. * **Population/Setting:** While the abstract doesn't specify exact sample sizes or locations for the studies reviewed, it implies a broad focus on healthcare workers in various settings (likely including nurses) who use HIS, particularly noting their concern about developing countries. This suggests findings might have wide applicability but could also vary based on local resources and infrastructure. * **Nursing Problem Framed:** The paper frames the problem as one of sustained usability of critical health technology under challenging conditions. For nurses, this means understanding that HIS disruptions can lead to delays in care, increased workload (as manual workarounds are needed), potential for errors, and frustration. Building digital resilience is key to mitigating these negative impacts. * **Source/Right Cautions:** The metadata indicates the paper comes from
Source abstract
Study Overview
Health Information Systems (HIS) have become critical infrastructure for improving healthcare delivery, particularly in developing countries. However, persistent digital disruptions such as unreliable connectivity, system failures, and limited technical support often threaten the continuous use of these systems by healthcare workers. While prior research has largely focused on initial adoption of HIS, evidence on the resilience mechanisms that enable sustained use under disruption remains fragmented across health, nursing, and information systems literatures. This study addresses this gap by synthesizing digital resilience factors that support healthcare workers’ continued use of HIS. Through a systematic literature review, 34 relevant studies were analyzed. From 82 initial codes, we derive 10 consolidated factors organized at three levels: personal capacity, organizational support, and technological factors and map each factor to the resilience capacity it primarily supports. The study contributes a multi-level perspective for strengthening resilient digital health systems and identifies gaps for future research.
Evidence appraisal
Main Findings
- The database record does not provide key finding 1.
- The database record does not provide key finding 2.
- The database record does not provide key finding 3.
- The database record does not provide key finding 4.
- The database record does not provide key finding 5.
Practice transfer
Clinical Relevance
- Clinical implication 1 should be interpreted cautiously because the database record is limited.
- Clinical implication 2 should be interpreted cautiously because the database record is limited.
- Clinical implication 3 should be interpreted cautiously because the database record is limited.
- Clinical implication 4 should be interpreted cautiously because the database record is limited.
- Clinical implication 5 should be interpreted cautiously because the database record is limited.
Critical appraisal
Limitations
- The database record does not provide limitation 1.
- The database record does not provide limitation 2.
- The database record does not provide limitation 3.
Classroom use
Discussion Questions
- Discussion question 1: What does "From Disruptions to Adaptation: A Systematic Literature Review of Digital Resilience Factors for Healthcare Workers' Continued Use of Health Information Systems" help nursing students evaluate?
- Discussion question 2: What does "From Disruptions to Adaptation: A Systematic Literature Review of Digital Resilience Factors for Healthcare Workers' Continued Use of Health Information Systems" help nursing students evaluate?
- Discussion question 3: What does "From Disruptions to Adaptation: A Systematic Literature Review of Digital Resilience Factors for Healthcare Workers' Continued Use of Health Information Systems" help nursing students evaluate?
- Discussion question 4: What does "From Disruptions to Adaptation: A Systematic Literature Review of Digital Resilience Factors for Healthcare Workers' Continued Use of Health Information Systems" help nursing students evaluate?
- Discussion question 5: What does "From Disruptions to Adaptation: A Systematic Literature Review of Digital Resilience Factors for Healthcare Workers' Continued Use of Health Information Systems" help nursing students evaluate?
- Discussion question 6: What does "From Disruptions to Adaptation: A Systematic Literature Review of Digital Resilience Factors for Healthcare Workers' Continued Use of Health Information Systems" help nursing students evaluate?
- Discussion question 7: What does "From Disruptions to Adaptation: A Systematic Literature Review of Digital Resilience Factors for Healthcare Workers' Continued Use of Health Information Systems" help nursing students evaluate?
- Discussion question 8: What does "From Disruptions to Adaptation: A Systematic Literature Review of Digital Resilience Factors for Healthcare Workers' Continued Use of Health Information Systems" help nursing students evaluate?
- Discussion question 9: What does "From Disruptions to Adaptation: A Systematic Literature Review of Digital Resilience Factors for Healthcare Workers' Continued Use of Health Information Systems" help nursing students evaluate?
- Discussion question 10: What does "From Disruptions to Adaptation: A Systematic Literature Review of Digital Resilience Factors for Healthcare Workers' Continued Use of Health Information Systems" help nursing students evaluate?
Search-ready answers
Frequently asked questions
What is the main focus of this systematic literature review?
The study focuses on identifying digital resilience factors that support healthcare workers' continued use of Health Information Systems (HIS), especially in contexts with persistent digital disruptions.
How many studies were analyzed for this review?
34 relevant studies were analyzed to derive the consolidated factors of digital resilience.
What are the three levels at which the 10 consolidated factors of digital resilience are organized?
The 10 consolidated factors are organized at three levels: personal capacity, organizational support, and technological factors.
Who are the authors of this study?
The study was authored by Mudasir Issah and Prof. Ibrahim Osman Adam.
What is the title of the journal where this article was published?
The article was published in the Journal of the Association for Information Systems.
When was this article published?
This article was published on 2026-07-05.
What type of study is described by this metadata?
The source describes a journal article, specifically a systematic literature review.
Which specific field or topic does this research primarily relate to according to the provided topics?
According to the topics listed in the metadata, this research primarily relates to Nursing Informatics.
What is one of the key challenges for healthcare workers mentioned regarding Health Information Systems (HIS) in developing countries?
Persistent digital disruptions such as unreliable connectivity, system failures, and limited technical support are identified as key challenges threatening the continuous use of HIS by healthcare workers in developing countries.
Why does this study suggest there is a gap in current research on HIS?
The study suggests there is a gap because prior research has largely focused on initial adoption of HIS, while evidence on resilience mechanisms enabling sustained use under disruption remains fragmented across health, nursing, and information systems literatures.