In brief
This NIH-funded study introduces the Safe Transfers And Mobility Program (STAMP), a supplemental mobility initiative for skilled nursing facilities. It aims to improve functional recovery in older adults by reducing sedentary time through patient engagement in walking and transfers, using trained aides alongside...
What this article is about
Quick Answer
This NIH-funded study introduces the Safe Transfers And Mobility Program (STAMP), a supplemental mobility initiative for skilled nursing facilities. It aims to improve functional recovery in older adults by reducing sedentary time through patient engagement in walking and transfers, using trained aides alongside interdisciplinary teams. The research evaluates STAMP's feasibility, acceptability, safety, and outcome measure suitability under usual care or high-intensity rehabilitation models.
Student takeaways
Key Takeaways
- STAMP is a supplemental mobility program designed to complement formal rehabilitation by reducing sedentary time through patient engagement in walking and functional transfers.
- The database record does not provide key finding 2.
- The database record does not provide key finding 3.
- The database record does not provide key finding 4.
- The database record does not provide key finding 5.
Student summary
Why This Research Matters
This article, titled 'Improving Functional Recovery in Skilled Nursing Facilities through Supplemental Mobility,' outlines a research project aimed at addressing the significant challenge of functional decline among older adults receiving post-acute care in skilled nursing facilities (SNFs). The study is funded by the National Institute on Aging and led by Jennifer Stevens-Lapsley. It focuses on an innovative program called STAMP, which stands for Safe Transfers And Mobility Program.
The core problem addressed by this research is that despite rehabilitation services being available to over 1.3 million older adults annually in SNFs after hospitalization, many patients still leave with functional limitations. These limitations increase the risk of rehospitalization, disability, institutionalization, or even mortality. A key contributing factor identified is sedentary behavior outside of scheduled therapy sessions, which leads to physical deconditioning and hinders recovery.
STAMP is designed as a scalable, patient-centered supplemental mobility program intended to complement formal rehabilitation efforts. The program involves trained mobility aides working alongside interdisciplinary teams – including physical therapists, occupational therapists, and nursing staff – to encourage patients in walking and functional transfers (such as bed mobility, sit-to-stands, wheelchair transfers) throughout the day. This approach aims to reduce sedentary time and promote sustained physical activity.
The research project has two specific aims: 1. To evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and safety of implementing STAMP in SNFs under different care models (usual care or high-intensity rehabilitation - HIR). This will involve assessing adherence to the intervention and gathering feedback from providers through surveys and focus groups. 2. To evaluate the feasibility and variability of candidate outcome measures for patients receiving STAMP. These outcomes include gait speed, short physical performance battery scores, Minimum Data Set – activities of daily living (MDS-ADL) scores, and modified Barthel Index scores. This evaluation will be conducted in SNFs providing either usual care or HIR.
The study design is mixed-methods, planned for implementation at two SNF sites selected from an ongoing trial: one site provides usual care, while the other delivers high-intensity rehabilitation (HIR). The research will employ a pretest-posttest design. This means data will be collected before and after the intervention phase where STAMP is integrated into daily care routines under interdisciplinary supervision.
Data collection methods are diverse and include existing electronic medical records, provider surveys, interviews, and focus groups. For Aim 1 (feasibility of STAMP implementation), feasibility and acceptability will be assessed through patient adherence to STAMP activities, alongside qualitative feedback from providers obtained via surveys, interviews, and focus groups. For Aim 2 (outcome measure feasibility), the feasibility of each candidate outcome measure will be evaluated based on completion rates.
The information gathered from these two aims is crucial for guiding future steps: Aim 1's findings will help refine the STAMP protocol itself, while Aim 2's results will inform the selection of appropriate outcome measures for larger-scale trials. This study represents a critical first step in generating foundational evidence to scale this low-cost, patient-centered mobility solution across SNFs.
The ultimate goal is to improve rehabilitation outcomes and facilitate more successful discharges to the community for older adults recovering from hospitalization. The research underscores the importance of addressing sedentary behavior as part of comprehensive post-acute care strategies in SNFs.
As a nursing student, you should appraise this study by considering its potential impact on patient-centered care models within SNFs and how interdisciplinary collaboration can be leveraged to improve functional recovery. It's important to note that the abstract describes a research *project* focused on feasibility and protocol refinement rather than presenting definitive clinical outcomes from completed trials. The source of this information is NIH RePORTER, which provides public project metadata for funded research initiatives.
When reasoning from the evidence presented in such a study (once results are available), nurses would consider how supplemental mobility programs like STAMP could be integrated into existing care plans to enhance patient activity and functional outcomes. They might also think about the roles of different healthcare team members, including trained mobility aides working alongside traditional rehabilitation staff.
It is crucial for students to understand that while this project aims to improve care, it's important not to overstate its current findings as definitive proof of STAMP's effectiveness without awaiting further research results. The study is a step towards building evidence for such interventions.
Source abstract
Study Overview
PROJECT SUMMARY ABSTRACT Over 1.3 million older adults receive post-acute care in skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) annually to support physical function recovery after hospitalization. Despite rehabilitation services, many patients are discharged with functional limitations, increasing the risk of rehospitalization, disability, institutionalization, or mortality. Sedentary behavior outside of scheduled therapy sessions exacerbates physical deconditioning and hinders recovery. The Safe Transfers And Mobility Program (STAMP) is introduced as a scalable, patient-centered supplemental mobility program designed to complement formal rehabilitation by engaging patients in walking and functional transfers (e.g., bed mobility, sit-to-stands, wheelchair transfers) throughout the day. The program uses trained mobility aides working alongside interdisciplinary teams, including physical therapists, occupational therapists, and nursing staff, to reduce sedentary time and promote sustained physical activity. By fostering collaboration between rehabilitation and nursing teams, STAMP directly addresses critical barriers to mobility and enhance physical recovery, promoting more successful discharges to the community. This study has two specific aims: Aim 1 will evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and safety of implementing STAMP in SNFs using either usual care or high-intensity rehabilitation (HIR) models, adherence to the intervention and provider feedback through surveys and focus groups. Aim 2 will evaluate the feasibility and variability of candidate outcome measures (gait speed, short physical performance battery, minimum data set – activities of daily living, modified Barthel Index) in patients receiving STAMP in SNFs with either usual care or HIR. The study will employ a mixed-methods approach at two SNF sites selected from an ongoing trial, one providing usual care and the other delivering HIR. We will use a pretest-posttest design, with a baseline period followed by an intervention phase where STAMP will be integrated into daily care routines under interdisciplinary supervision. We will collect data through existing electronic medical records, provider surveys, interviews, and focus groups. Intervention feasibility and acceptability will be assessed through patient adherence to STAMP, along with provider surveys, interviews, and focus groups. Feasibility of candidate outcomes will be evaluated based on completion rates. Information gathered from the two aims will guide refinement of the STAMP protocol (Aim 1) and selection of appropriate outcomes measures (Aim 2) for future larger-scale trials. This study represents a critical first step in generating foundational evidence to scale a low-cost, patient-centered mobility solution across SNFs to improve rehabilitation outcomes and community reintegration for older adults.
Evidence appraisal
Main Findings
- STAMP is a supplemental mobility program designed to complement formal rehabilitation by reducing sedentary time through patient engagement in walking and functional transfers.
- The database record does not provide key finding 2.
- The database record does not provide key finding 3.
- The database record does not provide key finding 4.
- The database record does not provide key finding 5.
Practice transfer
Clinical Relevance
- Potential for STAMP to improve physical recovery outcomes if proven effective, leading to better discharges from skilled nursing facilities (SNFs).
- Emphasis on the role of trained mobility aides working alongside interdisciplinary teams (PTs, OTs, nurses) as a scalable solution.
- Addresses critical barriers like sedentary behavior outside scheduled therapy sessions which exacerbate physical deconditioning.
- Clinical implication 4 should be interpreted cautiously because the database record is limited.
- Clinical implication 5 should be interpreted cautiously because the database record is limited.
Faculty notes
Educational Relevance
This article details an NIH-funded research project (1R21AG095336-01A1) led by Jennifer Stevens-Lapsley, focusing on improving functional recovery in skilled nursing facilities (SNFs). The core issue addressed is the high prevalence of functional limitations among older adults discharged from SNFs after hospitalization. Despite rehabilitation services, sedentary behavior outside therapy sessions contributes significantly to physical deconditioning and poor outcomes.
The study introduces STAMP – Safe Transfers And Mobility Program – a supplemental mobility initiative designed to complement formal rehabilitation. STAMP utilizes trained mobility aides working with interdisciplinary teams (physical therapists, occupational therapists, nursing staff) to engage patients in walking and functional transfers throughout the day, aiming to reduce sedentary time.
The research has two primary aims: 1. To evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and safety of implementing STAMP within SNFs under different care models: usual care versus high-intensity rehabilitation (HIR). This involves assessing adherence through direct observation or records, and gathering qualitative feedback via surveys and focus groups with providers. 2. To assess the feasibility and variability of candidate outcome measures for patients receiving STAMP in these settings. The specific outcomes to be evaluated include gait speed, short physical performance battery scores, Minimum Data Set – activities of daily living (MDS-ADL) scores, and modified Barthel Index scores.
The methodology is mixed-methods, planned at two SNF sites: one providing usual care and the other delivering HIR. A pretest-posttest design will be used, with a baseline period followed by an intervention phase where STAMP is integrated into daily routines under interdisciplinary supervision. Data collection methods include existing electronic medical records (for quantitative outcomes), provider surveys, interviews, and focus groups.
The anticipated outputs from this study are crucial for future development: Aim 1's findings will guide the refinement of the STAMP protocol itself, while Aim 2's results will inform the selection of appropriate outcome measures for larger-scale efficacy trials. This project represents a foundational step in generating evidence to scale a low-cost, patient-centered mobility solution across SNFs.
The study highlights the importance of addressing sedentary behavior as part of comprehensive post-acute care strategies and emphasizes interdisciplinary collaboration. For nursing faculty, this research underscores opportunities for curriculum development related to innovative care models, interdisciplinary teamwork, and evidence-based practice in geriatric rehabilitation settings within SNFs.
Critical appraisal
Limitations
- The study is primarily focused on feasibility and protocol refinement rather than definitive clinical outcomes from completed trials.
- Data collection relies heavily on existing electronic medical records for quantitative measures, which may have inherent limitations in completeness or accuracy.
- Generalizability might be limited by the selection of only two SNF sites (one usual care, one high-intensity rehabilitation) for initial evaluation.
Classroom use
Discussion Questions
- How does STAMP's focus on supplemental mobility differ from traditional formal rehabilitation services offered in SNFs?
- What specific training and qualifications are required for 'trained mobility aides' to effectively implement STAMP safely and competently?
- How might the integration of STAMP with existing interdisciplinary teams (PTs, OTs, nursing staff) impact workflow and resource allocation within an SNF?
- Which of the candidate outcome measures mentioned (gait speed, SPPB, MDS-ADL, modified Barthel Index) do you think would be most sensitive to detecting changes in functional recovery due to STAMP? Why?
- What are potential challenges in ensuring consistent adherence and implementation fidelity for a supplemental program like STAMP across different SNFs with varying resources?
- How might the findings from Aim 1 (feasibility of STAMP implementation) directly influence the design or content of future larger-scale efficacy trials?
- In what ways could patient preferences and individualized goals be incorporated into the STAMP protocol to enhance its acceptability and effectiveness?
- What are the potential cost implications for SNFs in implementing a program like STAMP, including training costs and staffing needs for mobility aides?
- How can this research contribute to evidence-based practice guidelines for post-acute care rehabilitation in skilled nursing facilities?
- Beyond physical function recovery, what other patient-centered outcomes (e.g., quality of life, psychological well-being) might be worth exploring as secondary endpoints if STAMP proves feasible?
Search-ready answers
Frequently asked questions
What is the main goal of the STAMP program described in this research project?
The main goal of the Safe Transfers And Mobility Program (STAMP) is to improve functional recovery in older adults receiving post-acute care in skilled nursing facilities (SNFs). It aims to reduce sedentary behavior outside scheduled therapy sessions and promote sustained physical activity through supplemental mobility activities.
Who are the intended beneficiaries of the STAMP program?
The STAMP program is designed for older adults who receive post-acute care in skilled nursing facilities, particularly those recovering from hospitalization and seeking to regain physical function.
What specific types of mobility activities does the STAMP program involve?
STAMP involves engaging patients in walking and functional transfers throughout the day. These include bed mobility (e.g., turning), sit-to-stands, wheelchair transfers, and other similar movements designed to promote activity beyond formal rehabilitation sessions.
How is the STAMP program implemented within skilled nursing facilities?
The STAMP program uses trained mobility aides who work alongside interdisciplinary teams in SNFs. This team includes physical therapists, occupational therapists, and nursing staff, all collaborating under interdisciplinary supervision to integrate supplemental mobility into daily care routines.
What are the two specific aims of this research study on STAMP?
Aim 1 is to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and safety of implementing STAMP in SNFs using either usual care or high-intensity rehabilitation (HIR) models. Aim 2 is to evaluate the feasibility and variability of candidate outcome measures for patients receiving STAMP.
What methods will be used to assess patient adherence and provider feedback on STAMP?
Patient adherence to STAMP will be assessed through surveys, interviews, focus groups with providers, and by tracking completion rates of candidate outcome measures. Provider feedback will also come from these same qualitative methods (surveys, interviews, focus groups) as well as direct observation.
What are some examples of the candidate outcome measures being evaluated in Aim 2?
Candidate outcome measures for evaluation include gait speed, short physical performance battery scores, Minimum Data Set – activities of daily living assessments, and modified Barthel Index scores. These will be assessed for their feasibility and variability.
What is the study design used to evaluate STAMP?
The study employs a mixed-methods approach at two SNF sites selected from an ongoing trial (one providing usual care, one delivering high-intensity rehabilitation). It uses a pretest-posttest design with a baseline period followed by an intervention phase where STAMP will be integrated into daily care routines.
What are the expected outcomes of successfully implementing and refining STAMP?
The successful implementation and refinement of STAMP is expected to lead to improved physical recovery for older adults in SNFs, reduced functional limitations upon discharge, lower risks of rehospitalization, disability, institutionalization, or mortality, and ultimately promote more successful discharges to the community.
What kind of data will be collected during this study?
Data will be collected through existing electronic medical records (for baseline information), provider surveys, interviews, focus groups (to gather qualitative feedback on feasibility and acceptability), and by tracking completion rates for candidate outcome measures.