Nursing research summary

Understanding Family Experiences: A Study on Mental Health Literacy in Adolescent Eating Disorder Diagnoses

A Spanish qualitative study interviewed 12 family members of adolescents with eating disorders and found that diagnosis, family relationships, healthcare resources, and treatment all shape the caregiving experience. Families wanted family-based therapy and stronger public health resources but often didn't receive them, underscoring nurses' role in mental health literacy and family-centered care.

Nursing Reports Published 2024 3 min read DOI 10.3390/nursrep14040302

In brief

A Spanish qualitative study interviewed 12 family members of adolescents with eating disorders and found that diagnosis, family relationships, healthcare resources, and treatment all shape the caregiving experience. Families wanted family-based therapy and stronger public health resources but often didn't receive...

What this article is about

Quick Answer

A Spanish qualitative study interviewed 12 family members of adolescents with eating disorders and found that diagnosis, family relationships, healthcare resources, and treatment all shape the caregiving experience. Families wanted family-based therapy and stronger public health resources but often didn't receive them, underscoring nurses' role in mental health literacy and family-centered care.

Student takeaways

Key Takeaways

  • Twelve family members of adolescents with eating disorders (7 mothers, 3 fathers, 1 grandfather, 1 sister) were interviewed, with adolescents predominantly diagnosed with anorexia nervosa (75%) versus bulimia nervosa (25%) at a mean age of 17.4 years.
  • Four thematic blocks emerged from inductive thematic analysis: diagnosis (triggers and behavioral changes), family (relationship and role disruption), resources (public system strain versus costly private care), and treatment (early intervention and multidisciplinary care).
  • Most families reported that trust and communication broke down after diagnosis, largely attributed to the concealment and deception the illness can drive, while one family described the experience as ultimately strengthening their relationship.
  • Families near-unanimously described the public health system as under-resourced, citing long waits for psychology services, understaffing, and a difficult transition from pediatric to adult care, pushing many toward costly private alternatives.
  • Although families strongly valued family involvement in treatment and wanted to be included, none of the participants had actually received formal family-based therapy despite recognizing it as vital to recovery.

Student summary

Why This Research Matters

Adolescent eating disorders such as anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa don't just affect the patient — they reshape the whole family. This Spanish study, published in Nursing Reports (2024), asked a simple but important question: what is it actually like to be the parent, sibling, or grandparent of a teenager going through diagnosis and treatment for an eating disorder?

The research team, based at universities and hospitals in Madrid, conducted a descriptive qualitative study using a phenomenological approach between January and February 2023. They interviewed 12 family members — seven mothers, three fathers, one grandfather, and one sister — recruited through posters at social-health centers, social media, and referrals from healthcare teams. To be included, family members had to have lived with the patient since diagnosis and the diagnosis had to be at least one year old. Participants had an average age of 44.7 years. Most of the adolescents involved had anorexia nervosa (75%), with the rest diagnosed with bulimia nervosa (25%), and the average age at diagnosis was 17.4 years. Interviews were semi-structured, lasted about 57 minutes on average, were conducted face-to-face or by video call depending on preference, and were audio-recorded and transcribed. The research team used inductive thematic analysis with double independent coding across five researchers and an external audit, using ATLAS-TI-24 software, and determined that data saturation was reached at 12 participants.

Four major theme blocks emerged. The first, diagnosis, covered the triggers families noticed before the formal diagnosis — social comparisons on social media, traumatic events like bereavement, and personality traits such as perfectionism and a strong need for control — along with behavioral changes like loss of cheerfulness, isolation, and emotional outbursts. Some families said they weren't surprised when the diagnosis came because they already suspected something was wrong; others described shock at the severity.

The second theme, family, described how the eating disorder reshaped relationships. While most families described good relationships with trust and communication before diagnosis, many reported that trust broke down afterward, in part because the illness itself pushes patients toward secrecy and deception. Couples described intense marital strain, arguing over how to handle treatment, while siblings often found themselves thrust into caregiving roles they felt unprepared for. Interestingly, one family described the experience as ultimately strengthening their bond.

The third theme, resources, captured near-universal frustration with the public health system: long waits for psychology appointments, understaffed services, and a difficult transition from pediatric to adult care. Many families turned to costly private care to fill these gaps, which put good treatment out of reach for some. Where nurses were directly involved, families valued their consistent follow-up and individualized care highly — though not everyone was fully aware of what nurses specifically contribute.

The fourth theme, treatment, emphasized the importance of acting quickly rather than assuming a problem will resolve on its own, embracing a multidisciplinary team (psychology, psychiatry, nutrition, and nursing), and involving the family directly in treatment. Notably, although families strongly wanted to be included in therapy, none of the participants in this study had actually received formal family-based therapy.

For nursing students, this study is a reminder that eating disorder care extends well beyond the identified patient. Mental health literacy — families' ability to understand the illness, recognize warning signs, and know how to seek help — comes through again and again as something nurses can actively build through education and communication. The findings also point to real gaps in continuity of care and family-inclusive treatment that future nursing practice and health policy could address. As with any single qualitative study of 12 participants in one region, these findings describe lived experience in depth but should not be generalized to all families or health systems.

Source abstract

Study Overview

Background: Adolescent eating disorders pose a significant public health challenge and strongly affect both physical and emotional well-being. Early diagnosis is important for improving treatment outcomes, though it remains complex due to multiple influencing factors. The family perspective is essential in this process, as it provides valuable insights into changes in adolescents’ habits and emotional health. Methods: A descriptive qualitative study was conducted between January and February 2023. Interviews were conducted with 12 participants using a phenomenological approach to explore the experiences and perspectives of family members of adolescents with eating disorders. Results: Four thematic blocks comprising several categories were identified: (T1) diagnosis, (T2) family, (T3) resources, and (T4) treatment. The participants emphasized the need for early intervention and a multidisciplinary approach to the treatment of eating disorders. Family therapy was recognized as vital to treatment, and common dissatisfaction with the public health structure underscores the need for greater investment in research and access to specialists. Mental health nurse practitioners play an important role in providing comprehensive care and support, as well as mental health literacy. Conclusions: A holistic, patient-centered approach, including family involvement and appropriate support systems, is key to improving the outcomes and quality of life of adolescents undergoing treatment for eating disorders. Improving healthcare resources and addressing the challenges faced by families is essential. In addition, mental health literacy is critical, as it enables families to understand the disease better, make informed decisions, and actively participate in the recovery process, thus contributing to improved therapeutic outcomes and quality of life for patients.

Study type: Open access journal article

Evidence appraisal

Main Findings

  • Twelve family members of adolescents with eating disorders (7 mothers, 3 fathers, 1 grandfather, 1 sister) were interviewed, with adolescents predominantly diagnosed with anorexia nervosa (75%) versus bulimia nervosa (25%) at a mean age of 17.4 years.
  • Four thematic blocks emerged from inductive thematic analysis: diagnosis (triggers and behavioral changes), family (relationship and role disruption), resources (public system strain versus costly private care), and treatment (early intervention and multidisciplinary care).
  • Most families reported that trust and communication broke down after diagnosis, largely attributed to the concealment and deception the illness can drive, while one family described the experience as ultimately strengthening their relationship.
  • Families near-unanimously described the public health system as under-resourced, citing long waits for psychology services, understaffing, and a difficult transition from pediatric to adult care, pushing many toward costly private alternatives.
  • Although families strongly valued family involvement in treatment and wanted to be included, none of the participants had actually received formal family-based therapy despite recognizing it as vital to recovery.

Practice transfer

Clinical Relevance

  • Nurses can support mental health literacy directly by helping families understand eating disorder triggers, warning signs, and the biological and psychological factors involved, since families in this study identified literacy as key to informed participation in care.
  • Because families described uneven awareness of what nurses specifically contribute, nurses may need to more explicitly communicate their role in continuous follow-up and individualized care so families can draw on that support.
  • Given the near-universal frustration with public system wait times and the pediatric-to-adult transition, nurses working in these settings should anticipate and proactively address care-continuity gaps for families.
  • Since families expressed a strong, largely unmet desire for formal family-based therapy, nurses on multidisciplinary teams can advocate for and help coordinate family-inclusive treatment pathways where feasible.
  • Recognizing that eating disorder diagnosis and treatment can strain marital relationships and shift siblings into caregiver roles, nurses should assess and support the broader family system, not only the identified adolescent patient.

Faculty notes

Educational Relevance

This paper reports a descriptive qualitative study, using a phenomenological approach, examining the lived experiences of family members caring for adolescents diagnosed with anorexia nervosa or bulimia nervosa. Conducted in the Madrid region of Spain between January and February 2023, the study recruited 12 family members (7 mothers, 3 fathers, 1 grandfather, 1 sister) via purposive/snowball sampling through social-health center posters, social media, and healthcare-team referrals. Inclusion required cohabitation with the patient since diagnosis and a diagnosis of at least one year's standing. Adolescents represented were predominantly diagnosed with anorexia nervosa (75%) versus bulimia nervosa (25%), with a mean age at diagnosis of 17.4 years.

Data were collected through semi-structured, in-depth interviews (mean duration ~57 minutes), conducted face-to-face or via video call per participant preference, audio-recorded, and transcribed verbatim, supplemented by field notes. Analysis followed an inductive thematic approach with double independent coding across five researchers, external audit, and ATLAS-TI-24 software support; the authors report data saturation at n=12. Rigor was addressed using Guba and Lincoln's criteria — credibility (researcher and data-source triangulation, external audit), transferability (detailed method and sample description), and confirmability. Ethics approval was obtained from a university hospital research ethics committee (PIC015-23FJD), with informed consent and GDPR/Spanish data-protection compliance.

Four thematic blocks structure the findings: (T1) Diagnosis — pre-diagnosis triggers (social media comparison, traumatic events, perfectionism/control traits) and behavioral changes (withdrawal, emotional lability), with mixed reactions to formal diagnosis ranging from confirmation of prior suspicion to shock; (T2) Family — disrupted trust and communication post-diagnosis (attributed partly to illness-driven concealment/deception), marital strain over treatment decisions, sibling role shifts into caregiving, and one case of relational strengthening; (T3) Resources — near-unanimous dissatisfaction with public system capacity (long waits, understaffing, poor pediatric-to-adult transition), reliance on costly private care, and strong valuation of nursing continuity where present, tempered by uneven family awareness of nursing's specific contributions; (T4) Treatment — emphasis on early intervention, embracing multidisciplinary teams, and a clearly expressed but largely unmet desire for formal family-based therapeutic involvement.

For discussion in class, this study offers a compact case for teaching several appraisal skills: evaluating small-sample qualitative designs for transferability versus depth, distinguishing rigor markers (triangulation, external audit, saturation) from generalizability claims, and connecting findings to health-systems critique (resource scarcity, care transitions) alongside relational/family-systems theory. It is well suited to seminars on family-centered mental health nursing, health literacy interventions, and the nurse's role on multidisciplinary eating-disorder teams. The near-total absence of formal family therapy despite strong family demand for it is a useful prompt for discussing implementation gaps between recommended and delivered care.

Limitations to flag for students include the small, geographically bounded sample (Madrid, Spain), potential recall bias inherent to retrospective family accounts, the individual (rather than dyadic or group) interview format — which cannot capture real-time family interaction dynamics — and limited demographic diversity among participants. The authors themselves recommend future research using group interviews or observational methods to better capture family interaction, and call for increased investment in specialist personnel, formal family-based therapy protocols, and mental health literacy programs, including education about biological contributors to anorexia nervosa such as hypoleptinemia. Although the study is set in Spain, the core issues transfer readily to Canadian mental-health nursing: constrained access to specialist eating-disorder services, difficult pediatric-to-adult care transitions, and family-based treatment that is endorsed as best practice yet unevenly delivered are all recognized challenges in Canada, making this a useful lens for discussing the nurse's role in family-centred care and mental health literacy within a publicly funded system.

Critical appraisal

Limitations

  • The sample of 12 family members from one region of Spain limits generalizability of findings to other health systems, cultures, or family structures.
  • Retrospective interviews about experiences since diagnosis are subject to recall bias in how family members reconstruct events and emotions.
  • Qualitative thematic analysis involves interpretive judgment, and while the authors used double coding and external audit, some subjectivity in theme construction is inherent to the method.

Classroom use

Discussion Questions

  • How might a nurse assess a family's current level of mental health literacy about eating disorders early in the care relationship, and what would that assessment change about the care plan?
  • Why might an eating disorder push a patient and family toward secrecy or deception, and how can nurses build trust without undermining the adolescent's sense of privacy or autonomy?
  • What specific nursing actions could help ease the transition from pediatric to adult eating-disorder services that families in this study described as poorly handled?
  • Given that families wanted formal family-based therapy but did not receive it, what barriers might exist between recommended practice and what services actually deliver, and how could a nurse help close that gap?
  • How should a nurse respond differently to a family that reports the eating disorder has strained their relationships versus one that reports it has strengthened their bond?
  • What role, if any, should siblings be given in the care team's communication and support plan, given that siblings in this study described unexpected caregiving burdens?
  • How can nurses balance advocating for cash-strapped families who cannot afford private care with working within the constraints of an under-resourced public system?
  • In what ways could a school of nursing curriculum incorporate biological explanations of eating disorders (such as hypoleptinemia) into family-facing education, as the authors recommend?
  • What are the strengths and weaknesses of using individual interviews, versus group interviews or direct observation, to study family experience of illness?
  • How would you evaluate the trustworthiness of this study's findings using Guba and Lincoln's criteria (credibility, transferability, confirmability), and what would strengthen it further?

Knowledge check

Quiz

1. What research design and approach did this study use?

  1. A randomized controlled trial
  2. A descriptive qualitative study using a phenomenological approach
  3. A retrospective cohort study
  4. A cross-sectional survey
Answer: A descriptive qualitative study using a phenomenological approach
Rationale: The abstract states: 'A descriptive qualitative study was conducted between January and February 2023... using a phenomenological approach to explore the experiences and perspectives of family members.'

2. How many family members were interviewed in this study?

  1. 5
  2. 12
  3. 25
  4. 50
Answer: 12
Rationale: The abstract and full text confirm interviews were conducted with 12 participants, with data saturation reached at that number.

3. What were the four thematic blocks identified in the analysis?

  1. Diagnosis, family, resources, and treatment
  2. Prevention, screening, medication, and discharge
  3. Genetics, environment, media, and peers
  4. Anxiety, depression, isolation, and recovery
Answer: Diagnosis, family, resources, and treatment
Rationale: The abstract states four thematic blocks were identified: '(T1) diagnosis, (T2) family, (T3) resources, and (T4) treatment.'

4. Which composition best describes the family members interviewed?

  1. 12 mothers only
  2. 7 mothers, 3 fathers, 1 grandfather, and 1 sister
  3. 6 mothers and 6 fathers
  4. All were siblings of the adolescent patient
Answer: 7 mothers, 3 fathers, 1 grandfather, and 1 sister
Rationale: The full-text details confirm the participant breakdown as 7 mothers, 3 fathers, 1 grandfather, and 1 sister.

5. According to the study, what was recognized as vital to treatment but was something participants had not actually received?

  1. Medication management
  2. Formal family-based therapy
  3. Hospitalization
  4. Nutritional counseling
Answer: Formal family-based therapy
Rationale: The abstract notes family therapy was 'recognized as vital to treatment,' while the full text specifies none of the participants had received formal family-based therapy despite wanting it.

6. What common dissatisfaction did families express regarding the health system?

  1. Dissatisfaction with hospital food quality
  2. Dissatisfaction with the public health structure, citing insufficient resources and long waits
  3. Dissatisfaction with the number of family visits allowed
  4. Dissatisfaction with insurance billing procedures
Answer: Dissatisfaction with the public health structure, citing insufficient resources and long waits
Rationale: The abstract states there was 'common dissatisfaction with the public health structure,' and the full text elaborates on long waits and understaffing.

7. Why is mental health literacy described as important in this study's conclusions?

  1. It allows families to understand the disease better, make informed decisions, and participate in recovery
  2. It replaces the need for professional treatment
  3. It is only relevant to healthcare providers, not families
  4. It guarantees full recovery from the eating disorder
Answer: It allows families to understand the disease better, make informed decisions, and participate in recovery
Rationale: The abstract states mental health literacy 'enables families to understand the disease better, make informed decisions, and actively participate in the recovery process.'

8. What role did the authors identify for mental health nurse practitioners?

  1. Prescribing psychiatric medication independently
  2. Providing comprehensive care and support, and contributing to mental health literacy
  3. Conducting the formal diagnostic assessment only
  4. Managing hospital billing for families
Answer: Providing comprehensive care and support, and contributing to mental health literacy
Rationale: The abstract states: 'Mental health nurse practitioners play an important role in providing comprehensive care and support, as well as mental health literacy.'

9. What is one limitation the study authors themselves identified?

  1. The study included too many participants to analyze effectively
  2. Individual interviews could not capture real-time family interaction dynamics
  3. The interviews were too short to gather any useful data
  4. No ethics approval was obtained
Answer: Individual interviews could not capture real-time family interaction dynamics
Rationale: The full text lists this as a limitation, noting future research should use group interviews or observation to better capture family interaction.

10. What did the authors conclude was key to improving outcomes and quality of life for adolescents in eating disorder treatment?

  1. Strict isolation from family during treatment
  2. A holistic, patient-centered approach including family involvement and appropriate support systems
  3. Reliance solely on private healthcare providers
  4. Avoiding any discussion of mental health literacy with families
Answer: A holistic, patient-centered approach including family involvement and appropriate support systems
Rationale: The abstract concludes: 'A holistic, patient-centered approach, including family involvement and appropriate support systems, is key to improving the outcomes and quality of life.'

Study cards

Flashcards

What type of study design did this research use?

A descriptive qualitative study using a phenomenological approach.

When and where was data collected for this study?

Interviews were conducted between January and February 2023 in the Madrid region of Spain.

How many family members participated in the study?

Twelve family members participated, and data saturation was reported at that number.

What was the composition of the family members interviewed?

Seven mothers, three fathers, one grandfather, and one sister.

What were the eating disorder diagnoses of the adolescents involved?

75% anorexia nervosa and 25% bulimia nervosa.

What was the mean age at diagnosis for the adolescents in this study?

17.4 years.

What sampling method was used to recruit participants?

Purposive/snowball sampling via posters at social-health centers, social media, and healthcare-team referrals.

What interview format was used, and how long did interviews last on average?

Semi-structured, in-depth interviews, averaging about 57 minutes, conducted face-to-face or by video call.

What data analysis method and software were used?

Inductive thematic analysis with double independent coding by five researchers, using ATLAS-TI-24 software.

What are the four thematic blocks identified in this study?

Diagnosis (T1), family (T2), resources (T3), and treatment (T4).

What triggers did families identify as preceding the eating disorder diagnosis?

Social media comparisons, traumatic events like bereavement, and personality traits such as perfectionism and a strong need for control.

How did families describe changes to trust and relationships after diagnosis?

Most reported trust and communication broke down, partly because the illness can drive concealment or deception, though one family reported the experience strengthened their bond.

What frustration did families express about the public health system?

Long waits for psychology services, understaffing, and a poor transition from pediatric to adult care.

How did families cope with public system limitations?

Many turned to costly private healthcare, which made comprehensive treatment inaccessible for some families.

How did families view the role of nurses in this study?

They valued nurses' continuity of follow-up and individualized care, though awareness of nurses' specific contributions varied.

What treatment element did families want but largely did not receive?

Formal family-based therapy, despite recognizing it as vital and wanting to be included.

What quality/rigor framework did the researchers use to establish trustworthiness?

Guba and Lincoln's criteria, including credibility, transferability, and confirmability, supported by triangulation and external audit.

What ethics approval and consent procedures were followed?

Approval from a university hospital research ethics committee, with written informed consent and compliance with GDPR and Spanish data-protection law.

What is one limitation the authors noted about their interview method?

Individual interviews could not capture real-time family interaction dynamics; group interviews or observation were recommended for future research.

What did the authors conclude is essential for improving adolescent eating disorder outcomes?

A holistic, patient-centered approach that includes family involvement, adequate support systems, and improved mental health literacy.

Search-ready answers

Frequently asked questions

What was the purpose of this study on families and adolescent eating disorders?

The study aimed to explore the experiences and perspectives of family members of adolescents diagnosed with eating disorders, focusing on diagnosis, family dynamics, healthcare resources, and treatment.

How many people were interviewed for this eating disorder family study?

Twelve family members were interviewed: seven mothers, three fathers, one grandfather, and one sister, and the researchers reported reaching data saturation at this number.

Where was this study conducted?

The study was conducted in the Madrid region of Spain, with interviews collected between January and February 2023.

What are the four main themes found in this eating disorder family research?

The four themes are diagnosis (triggers and behavioral changes), family (relationship and role changes), resources (healthcare system limitations), and treatment (early intervention and multidisciplinary care).

Did families in this study receive family-based therapy for eating disorders?

No. Although families recognized family therapy as vital and wanted to be included, none of the participants had actually received formal family-based therapy.

What did families say about the public healthcare system for eating disorder treatment?

Families widely described the public system as under-resourced, citing long waits for psychology appointments, understaffing, and a difficult transition from pediatric to adult care, which pushed many toward costly private care.

What role do nurses play in eating disorder care according to this study?

Nurses were valued for providing continuous follow-up, individualized care, and support to comprehensive multidisciplinary treatment, and the authors highlight mental health nurse practitioners as key contributors to mental health literacy and family support.

What is mental health literacy and why does it matter for eating disorder families?

Mental health literacy refers to understanding a mental health condition well enough to make informed decisions and participate in care; the study concludes it helps families understand the disease and actively contribute to the adolescent's recovery.

How did eating disorder diagnosis affect family relationships in this study?

Most families reported that trust and communication broke down after diagnosis, partly due to concealment behaviors driven by the illness, and many described marital strain and siblings taking on unexpected caregiving roles, though one family described a strengthened bond.

What are the limitations of this qualitative study on eating disorder families?

Limitations include a small sample of 12 family members from one region of Spain, potential recall bias, inherent interpretive subjectivity in qualitative analysis, and the use of individual interviews, which could not capture real-time family interaction dynamics.