Nursing research summary

Risk Education for Prevention of Eating Disorders among Korean American Women

ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Published 2022 3 min read

What this article is about

In brief

In a DNP project, a single culturally tailored educational session doubled eating disorder knowledge scores among 20 Korean American women, and EAT-26 screening found all 20 participants at high lifetime risk for an eating disorder. The project recommends training providers in culturally appropriate eating disorder...

For nursing students

Study summary

Eating disorders — anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, and binge-eating disorder — are serious mental illnesses tied to distorted body image and harmful behaviors around food and weight. This Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) project, completed by Jessica Hyunjung Oh at the University of Arizona, looked at a group that is often overlooked in eating disorder research: Korean American women. The author noted that research on Korean Americans and eating disorders is limited, even though this population faces cultural pressure around body weight and appearance, alongside broader weight stigma present in Korean culture.

To address this gap, Oh designed and delivered an in-person educational session for a community group of Korean American women attending a Korean church in Phoenix, Arizona. The session used a PowerPoint presentation to teach participants about the three main types of eating disorders, the risk factors involved, and resources available for people struggling with disordered eating. A specific goal was to raise awareness of weight stigma as it affects this cultural group, since unrealistic body weight ideals can shape how women see themselves and how they are treated by others.

Twenty Korean American women took part in the project. Before the session, participants completed a pretest, and after the session they completed a posttest, both designed to measure their knowledge about eating disorders. Everyone also completed the EAT-26 (Eating Attitudes Test), a validated 26-item screening tool that looks at attitudes, feelings, and behaviors connected to disordered eating, and a satisfaction survey about the presentation itself.

The results were notable on two fronts. First, knowledge improved substantially: the number of correct answers on the posttest was double the number on the pretest, suggesting the education session was effective at teaching participants about eating disorders, their risks, and where to find help. Second, and more strikingly, the EAT-26 results showed that all twenty participants screened as being at high risk for an eating disorder at some point in their lives. That finding, involving every single participant, underscores just how prevalent disordered eating risk may be within this community sample, even though it does not by itself mean all twenty women currently have a diagnosed eating disorder. Finally, participants reported being satisfied with the content of the presentation.

Oh concluded that a PowerPoint-based educational session was an effective way to increase Korean American women's knowledge about eating disorders and to help them identify relevant risks and resources. Based on these results, the project recommended that healthcare providers, including nurses, receive training in culturally appropriate care for patients navigating eating disorders, particularly within Asian American communities where these issues can be underrecognized or stigmatized.

For nursing students, this project is a good example of how a DNP quality-improvement or practice-change project can target a specific, under-served population with a low-cost, low-barrier intervention: one educational session delivered in a familiar community setting. It also illustrates how screening tools like the EAT-26 can be used practically, outside of a hospital or clinic, to identify people who may benefit from further evaluation or referral. At the same time, students should notice what this project can and cannot tell us. Twenty participants from one church group in one city is a small, specific sample; the EAT-26 identifies risk based on self-reported attitudes and behaviors, it is not a diagnostic tool, and a single educational session cannot be expected to change entrenched cultural attitudes toward body weight on its own. Read this project as a hopeful pilot demonstrating feasibility and impact within one community, not as proof that this exact approach will generalize to all Korean American women or other Asian American populations. The project's main practical takeaway for practicing nurses is straightforward: ask about eating attitudes and body image even with patients from cultural backgrounds where eating disorders are assumed to be rare, and be ready to offer culturally sensitive education and referral resources when risk is identified — a lesson that applies equally to Canadian nurses caring for Korean-Canadian and other Asian-Canadian patients.

Original publication

Source abstract and study details

Read the source abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this Doctoral of Nursing Practice (DNP) project was to implement and evaluate an in-person educational session to enhance knowledge about eating disorders, risks, and resources through a culturally appropriate manner to a community Korean American women's group. It is also aimed to raise cultural awareness towards weight stigma among Korean American women. Background: Eating disorders are a mental illness that includes tenacious behavior associated with cruel mentality towards oneself. There are three different types of eating disorders: anorexia nervosa (AN), bulimia nervosa (BN), and binge-eating disorder (BED). Body image and perceptions of a normal body weight can be altered from cultural and societal pressures. Korean American women are at high risk for disordered eating and distorted body image due to their culture's unrealistic goals of body weight. Research on Korean American and eating disorders are limited, and the need for proper risk interventions are critical to prevent adverse health outcomes. Methods: An in-person educational session was implemented for Korean American women attending a Korean local church in Phoenix, AZ. A quantitative pretest and posttest, EAT-26, and a satisfaction survey were handed out to evaluate the participants' knowledge about eating disorders. A total of 20 participants attended and responded to the implementation. Results: The project successfully improved the participants' knowledge on eating disorders. The correct answers of the posttest doubled those of the pretest. EAT-26 scores revealed the possible risk for an eating disorder based on attitudes, feelings, and behaviors. All twenty women answered to being at high risk for an eating disorder at some point in their lives. Participants were satisfied with the presentation content as assessed through the survey. Conclusion: The PowerPoint education was an effective tool to increase Korean American women's knowledge on eating disorders. The participants were able to identify the risks and resources for eating disorders. Future practice recommendations include educating providers in clinics to provide culturally appropriate care for patients dealing with eating disorders.

Source type: Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations

Reviewed findings

Main findings

  • The DNP project delivered a single in-person, PowerPoint-based educational session on eating disorders to a community group of 20 Korean American women recruited through a Korean church in Phoenix, Arizona.
  • Posttest scores on the eating disorder knowledge assessment doubled pretest scores, indicating a substantial improvement in knowledge following the education session.
  • All 20 participants screened as being at high risk for an eating disorder at some point in their lives, based on their EAT-26 (Eating Attitudes Test) results.
  • Participants reported satisfaction with the content of the educational presentation, as measured by a satisfaction survey.
  • The author concluded that the PowerPoint education was an effective tool for increasing Korean American women's knowledge of eating disorders and helping them identify relevant risks and resources.

For teaching and learning

Education implications

  • Nurses and other providers should not assume eating disorder risk is low in Korean American or other Asian American patients; culturally informed screening should be offered even when a group is not traditionally viewed as high risk.
  • Brief, culturally tailored educational sessions delivered in trusted community settings (such as faith organizations) may be a feasible, low-cost way to raise eating disorder awareness in under-served populations.
  • Validated screening tools like the EAT-26 can be incorporated into community health outreach, not just clinical settings, to identify individuals who may benefit from further evaluation or referral.
  • Providers working with Korean American or other Asian American communities should be prepared to address weight stigma and culturally specific body image pressures as part of eating disorder education and counseling.
  • The project supports the broader practice recommendation that clinics train providers in culturally appropriate care for patients dealing with eating disorders, particularly within populations where these conditions may be underrecognized.

For educators

Teaching and appraisal notes

This DNP scholarly project, completed by Jessica Hyunjung Oh at the University of Arizona (2022), addresses a documented gap in the literature: the scarcity of eating disorder research and intervention specific to Korean American women. The project's stated background rationale is that body image and perceptions of normal body weight are shaped by cultural and societal pressures, and that Korean American women face elevated risk for disordered eating and distorted body image tied to culturally specific ideals of thinness, alongside broader weight stigma documented in Korean and Korean American communities.

The intervention was a single in-person educational session delivered via PowerPoint to a community group of Korean American women recruited through a Korean church in Phoenix, Arizona. This is a classic DNP quality-improvement/practice project design: a targeted educational intervention evaluated with a pretest–posttest structure rather than an experimental or quasi-experimental comparison-group design. Twenty participants completed the full protocol, which included a knowledge pretest and posttest, the EAT-26 (a validated, widely used 26-item self-report screening instrument for disordered eating attitudes and behaviors), and a satisfaction survey.

Two results merit emphasis for classroom discussion. First, the doubling of correct posttest answers relative to pretest is a straightforward, clinically meaningful demonstration that a single culturally tailored session can measurably improve health literacy about eating disorders in an under-served population. Second, and more clinically consequential, all twenty participants screened positive for high lifetime risk of an eating disorder on the EAT-26. This finding, drawn from a convenience sample of church-attending community members rather than a clinical population, is striking and worth unpacking with students: it may reflect a genuinely high-risk population, it may reflect self-selection (women more concerned about body image may have been more likely to attend), or it may reflect known limitations of the EAT-26 as a screening rather than diagnostic tool. Instructors should use this as a teaching moment about the difference between screening-positive and diagnosed prevalence, and about how convenience sampling can inflate or skew apparent risk estimates.

Methodologically, the abstract does not report inferential statistics, effect sizes, or a formal limitations section, and no full peer-reviewed publication accompanies the ProQuest/ERIC dissertation record; some procedural detail (recruitment method beyond the church setting, session length, instrument psychometrics as applied here, follow-up duration) is not available from the metadata reviewed. Students and faculty appraising this project should treat it as a small, single-site, single-session DNP implementation project with strong face validity and a clear practice recommendation (training providers in culturally appropriate care for Asian American patients with eating disorder risk) rather than as generalizable efficacy evidence.

Discussion in seminar could productively center on: how nurses can build culturally responsive screening and education into community outreach; the tension between brief, low-cost interventions and the need for sustained behavior change; and how DNP projects of this scale still generate actionable, publishable practice knowledge even without a comparison group. The project is a useful exemplar for teaching translational, community-based DNP scholarship, and for discussing how underrepresented populations in eating disorder research can be reached through trusted community institutions like faith organizations. For Canadian nursing educators, the transferable lesson is not the specific US church setting but the underlying principle of culturally responsive, community-embedded outreach: Canada's sizeable and diverse Korean-Canadian and broader Asian-Canadian communities are subject to the same mistaken assumption that eating disorders are rare in East Asian populations, and cultural-competence and person-centred-care expectations familiar to Canadian community and primary-care nurses support the same screen-plus-educate-plus-refer approach.

Critical appraisal

Limitations

  • The sample consisted of only 20 participants from a single community group at one church in one city, limiting how far the findings can be generalized to other Korean American women or Asian American populations.
  • The project used a single pretest–posttest design without a comparison or control group, so improvements in knowledge cannot be definitively attributed to the education session alone.
  • The EAT-26 is a screening instrument, not a diagnostic tool; the finding that all participants were at high risk indicates elevated screening results, not confirmed eating disorder diagnoses.

Classroom use

Discussion Questions

  • Why might Korean American women be considered an under-researched population in eating disorder studies, and what does this project's finding suggest about the risks of that research gap?
  • How did the project use a trusted community institution (a local church) to reach participants, and what are the advantages and limitations of recruiting through faith-based community groups?
  • What is the difference between a screening-positive result on the EAT-26 and a clinical diagnosis of an eating disorder, and why does that distinction matter when interpreting this project's results?
  • All 20 participants screened at high risk for an eating disorder on the EAT-26. What factors could explain this finding beyond genuinely high prevalence, such as sampling or self-selection?
  • How might cultural weight stigma specific to Korean and Korean American communities shape both the risk for disordered eating and the willingness of women to seek help?
  • What are the strengths and weaknesses of using a pretest–posttest design without a control group to evaluate an educational intervention like this one?

Source-based questions

Frequently asked questions

What is the EAT-26 and why was it used?

The EAT-26 (Eating Attitudes Test) is a 26-item self-report screening tool that measures attitudes, feelings, and behaviors linked to eating disorder risk. It was used in this project to assess participants' risk level after the educational session.

Does an EAT-26 high-risk score mean someone has an eating disorder?

Not necessarily. The EAT-26 is a screening tool, not a diagnostic instrument, so a high-risk score indicates elevated concern warranting further evaluation rather than a confirmed diagnosis.

Where can I find the full dissertation?

The dissertation is indexed in ERIC (ID ED630527) and held by ProQuest LLC; access to the full text typically requires an institutional library subscription or a request through ProQuest.